Secure the effective clause
Collect the foundation deed, supplementary deed and amendments in chronological order.
Legal basis: Section 5 PSG, Section 9 PSG
How a successor clause works after a beneficiary dies, when an expectancy arises and which deed provisions and evidence govern succession.
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Foundation law team, Salzburg and throughout Austria
Your matter is handled by a team combining corporate law, asset succession, real estate law and dispute resolution. We review the foundation declaration, board resolutions, information rights and liability issues and set out clear next steps. Mag. Bernhard Brandauer is responsible for the legal advice, supported by further specialised lawyers of the firm where the matter requires it.
If a named beneficiary of a private foundation dies, a successor clause determines whether and when another person takes that position. A mere expectation of becoming a beneficiary later still requires a careful reading of the clause.
The interpretation depends on the wording of the effective foundation deed, the occurrence of the stated event and any conditions attached to the succession. The successor may be identified directly, may have to provide further evidence or may have to be selected by the body appointed in the deed.
This article deals only with a successor clause following the death of a beneficiary. General beneficiary determination, amendment of the beneficiary class and a particular distribution are separate matters.
Section 5 PSG links beneficiary status to designation in the foundation deed or, where no designation exists, to determination by the body appointed for that purpose or by the foundation board. Section 9(1) no. 3 PSG requires the deed to designate the beneficiary or name a body that will determine the beneficiary. A successor clause must be placed within this documentary framework.
If the deed already states that a particular person succeeds the former beneficiary on death, the clause points to a deed-based replacement rule. The practical review then focuses on the triggering event and the conditions attached to the rule. Death alone does not show that every condition has been met.
A deed may instead use open wording such as “suitable successors” or refer to a later selection. The scope of that discretion must then be established separately. A specific person cannot be inferred from such wording without reviewing the authority and selection criteria.
The wording of the deed determines which review follows the death.
| Provision in the deed | Question after death | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| Named replacement person | Has death occurred and are the stated conditions fulfilled? | Secure the deed version, prove the event and record the status |
| Order of succession or class named | Which person satisfies the order or class condition? | Apply the clause and document the relevant facts |
| Selection by an appointed body | Which body may select and what criteria limit it? | Record authority, selection and any determination separately |
“Expectancy” refers here to the anticipated later beneficiary position. It must be distinguished from an existing claim to a particular distribution.
A successor clause may refer to death, a waiver, an effective disclaimer or several events together. The relevant trigger must be identified from the wording of the deed. A temporary refusal or the failure to draw a benefit cannot simply be treated as death.
The file should bring together the deed, proof of death and the relevant chronology. It is also important to check whether the clause refers to death before or after a particular determination, before a distribution or upon the loss of beneficiary status. Those time references may change the order of the review.
If the clause does not address a special situation clearly, the gap should be stated and interpreted in the context of the complete documentary scheme. A private arrangement among relatives cannot replace the foundation deed.
The successor clause regulates who may become the next beneficiary of the foundation. It does not automatically make the deceased beneficiary’s legal successors beneficiaries. The death also does not, without further review, dispose of every legal position that may already have arisen.
The analysis should distinguish an expectancy, an already established status and a specific distribution claim. The foundation deed may attach different consequences to each situation. The wording, structure and time-specific legal effect of the deed remain central.
If a claim or a distribution resolution already existed at the time of death, it requires a separate review from future succession. The clause identifying the next beneficiary cannot silently resolve an outstanding payment or estate issue.
A defined sequence prevents the successor from being treated as a beneficiary too early.
Collect the foundation deed, supplementary deed and amendments in chronological order.
Legal basis: Section 5 PSG, Section 9 PSG
Record the date of death and the event described in the clause.
Review identity, order, family line or other clause-based requirements.
Separate a direct replacement rule from selection by an appointed body.
Record succession, unresolved points and any later distribution separately.
A succession rule may name one replacement person, several people in an order or a class defined by characteristics. Where an order is used, the first person must be checked at the time of death. The next person may become relevant only if the first person also fails to qualify.
Terms such as “children”, “descendants”, “family” or “issue” require interpretation in the context of the deed. The clause may refer to a generation, a particular line or a separate allocation. A general family-law assumption does not replace the wording of the deed.
Uncertainty about simultaneous death, prior death or the order of several successors should be stated in the result. The foundation should not place a presumed ranking into its records and resolutions.
The deed may identify the successor directly after death. It may also name a class and appoint a body to select or determine the next person. Those designs lead to different next steps.
If the replacement person is immediately identifiable from the clause, the file should describe the process as applying the existing succession rule. If an appointed body must select a person from a class or make a binding determination, its authority and the limits of its task require an additional review.
Section 9(2) no. 10 PSG permits the deed to specify the beneficiary or further beneficiaries in greater detail. This allows a differentiated succession rule. The individual clause remains the starting point; a general replacement rule cannot be imported into every deed.
These questions address only the replacement and succession provision.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
Place the effective deed, proof of death, fulfilled conditions and directly identified replacement person in one succession file. Keep later distribution questions separate.
Collect the foundation deed and supplementary deed with all effective amendments. Treat a person as successor only once the replacement rule can be traced to the effective version.
Check proof of death and whether the clause requires an additional condition. Identify the successor only after the triggering event and its timing are clear.
Identify the body appointed in the deed, its criteria and the required resolution form. Record the selection separately from a later distribution and from any inheritance issue.
In foundation law, structure, deadlines and evidence decide. Call us directly or write to us, callback within one business day.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000